Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
Date
Msg-id 3630.1548441241@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.  ("ldh@laurent-hasson.com" <ldh@laurent-hasson.com>)
Responses Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
List pgsql-performance
"ldh@laurent-hasson.com" <ldh@laurent-hasson.com> writes:
> Also, the original statement i implemented did not have all of that. This is the normalized SQL that Postgres now
giveswhen looking at the indices. 

[ squint... ]  What do you mean exactly by "Postgres gives that"?
I don't see any redundant COLLATE clauses in e.g. psql \d.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "ldh@laurent-hasson.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
Next
From: "ldh@laurent-hasson.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.