On 9/25/25, 3:47 PM, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie <mailto:pg@bowt.ie>> wrote:
> Should be noted that the regression itself is definitely "a small
> effect that is multiplied by repetition". This makes the problem
> rather perverse (though it's not exactly unusual for a complaint about
> a planner regression to be perverse, in one way or another).
Thanks for confirming. We can develop a strategy for working around
this effect, so from my point of view, we can consider this matter
resolved. I'm guessing that you feel the same way, but if not, I'm
happy to help out in any way I can.
In any case, I do appreciate your efforts and the time you took to
write out the very helpful explanations you provided. __
-- todd
