Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length
Date
Msg-id BD8F60C3-19CD-11D8-A78A-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length  ("Andreas Grabmüller" <webmaster@letzplay.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length
List pgsql-www
On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 10:32 PM, Andreas Grabmüller wrote:
> Have you looked at the apache download site? I think it's goot (of
> course, we can put the mirror chooser under the download links - it
> doesn't matter for the functionality as always a different (random?)
> server gets preselected automatically...

Yes, I did. I thought it was pretty good. Nice and clean. And I like
how it chooses a server. I don't know how it selects. You could do it
by location (nearness to the client ip), server load (weight those with
lower server load). I'm sure there are other ways as well.

I have seen examples where you choose the download, then the server. I
wish I can think of one right now...

Michael

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Andreas Grabmüller"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: new poll