Re: pg_listener in 9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: pg_listener in 9.0
Date
Msg-id BANLkTingGgumxMLuORxN3qXnh8uEW_zpgQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_listener in 9.0  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_listener in 9.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> The whole point of the revamp was that pg_listener was a major performance
> bottleneck and needed to go, and without it being gone we would not have got
> notification payloads.

Yeah, I know why it was replaced. That doesn't mean we cannot provide
an alternative interface to the same info though (other things might
of course).

> I suspect you're pretty much out of luck.

Not me - our users.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: vacuum and row type
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Cube Index Size