On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:49:30 am Dave Page wrote:
>
>>
>> Putting aside the fact that Damien pointed out that the PGXN website
>> is out of date (and therefore so is my information on the lack of a
>> cli), no, those are not the same. The code for both projects is there
>> in 9.1 and can be used for production applications. Those two features
>> are in no way vapourware, nor are they a WIP, at least as far as the
>> feature set for this release is concerned.
>
>
> The same applies to PGXN, the framework is there and people are using it, I fail
> to see the distinction.
<sigh>
Because according to the PGXN website, there isn't a client interface
yet, making it no more useful that the software catalog on the main
project website - eg. vapourware, as far as the primary intended
purpose is concerned.
Damien pointed out that the PGXN website is out of date, and there is
now a command line client, so my objection is withdrawn.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
