Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinRHxgs7YZF6YDEWY=G=J0B8NUbJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
List pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> However, it would in a lot of cases be very useful to have osmething
>> like CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE <blah>. Which would only accept
>> temporary (and maybe unlogged) tables. And then would auto-create the
>> PG_<version>_<catversion> directory upon startup.
>>
>> That's obviously a 9.2 feature though, it's not an adjustment of an
>> existing one, it's brand new :-)
>
> Yes, that's a nice feature for 9.2

+1.  That's a really nice idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: ubuntu software center