Re: 2 questions re RAID - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: 2 questions re RAID
Date
Msg-id BANLkTinMiaMYu-VVkWmibvUSoWvWWOJ5Mw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2 questions re RAID  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
Responses Re: 2 questions re RAID  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> wrote:
> RAID-1 & RAID-10 are not ruled out, I'm just exploring options. And I'm not actually wanting to use RAID 5; it's RAID
6that I'm considering... 

You have 4 disk bays and you want RAID-6?  How will that improve
anything over RAID-10?  You will have the same amount of available
space, and the writes will be slower.  Ok...there is *one* advantage:
you can lose any two drives at the same time and still survive, with
RAID-10 if you lose the wrong two drives you're hosed.

That said, on one of my production DB's, I have a 16-bay raid
enclosure and I run RAID-6 + hot spare.  It even has an Areca
controller made visible to the server as a single drive via fibre
channel.  Very sweet setup.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vick Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: 2 questions re RAID
Next
From: "Leon Match"
Date:
Subject: Call procedure from a Job, Test a Job in pgAdmin?