Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Date
Msg-id BANLkTimBzdqge6irhEjU+uTzn-MVjfxZ7w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors  (Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
2011/6/19 Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>:
> On 11-06-18 06:36 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
>>
>> On 11-06-08 04:14 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> Here is my review of this patch
>>
>> Submission Review:
>> ------------------------
>> The patch applies cleanly against master
>> The patch does not include any documentation updates (see note below to
>> update config.sgml)
>> The patch does not include any unit tests. At a minimum it should add a
>> few tests with verbosity set to verbose
>>
>
> On second thought tests might not work. Is the only way to get the
> constraint details are in verbose mode where line numbers from the c file
> are also included? If so then this won't work for the regression tests.
> Having the diff comparison fail every time someone makes an unrelated change
> to a source file isn't what we want.
>

it is reason why patch doesn't any regress test changes. I have to
look, if verbose mode is documented somewhere.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql performance - SearchCatCache issue