On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 16:06, Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>
>> On May 13, 2011 9:58 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> >>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>>> >>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>>> >>
>>> >> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and
>>> >> just
>>> >> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of
>>> >> getting
>>> >> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
>>> >
>>> > Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
>>> > my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
>>> > sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
>>> > for over three years now.
>>>
>>> Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
>>> then you know what my memory is like.
>>
>> Pretty sure I've mentioned it to you. But the "formal asking" was to at
>> least one, but I think both, the Josh:es.
>
> That's not what is documented here: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring
AFAICS, that page says nothing about whom to contact to get on the
list, so I contacted a couple of the members on the committee. It
seemed logical...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
