On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2011 9:58 AM, "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:53, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 05/12/2011 02:49 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >>> I think this scheme would be a lot simpler and easier to maintain, and
>> >>> result in less arguing about what level someone should be.
>> >>
>> >> Except that nobody argues about it. The sponsorship team discusses and
>> >> just
>> >> runs with it. Can you provide some evidence of blockage in terms of
>> >> getting
>> >> people appropriate sponsorship levels?
>> >
>> > Despite asking more tha nonce, and getting confirmed more than once,
>> > my company is still not listed under sponsors, even though they have
>> > sponsored *many* hours of both development and sysadmin work for me
>> > for over three years now.
>>
>> Out of interest, who did you ask? I don't remember it being me, but
>> then you know what my memory is like.
>
> Pretty sure I've mentioned it to you. But the "formal asking" was to at
> least one, but I think both, the Josh:es.
That's not what is documented here: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Sponsoring
Does the sponsorship committee have a mailing list?
-selena
--
http://chesnok.com
