Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Maria L. Wilson
<Maria.L.Wilson-1@nasa.gov> wrote:
> Would really appreciate someone taking a look at the query below....  Thanks
> in advance!
>
>
> this is on a linux box...
> Linux dsrvr201.larc.nasa.gov 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 9 03:27:37
> EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> explain analyze
> select MIN(IV.STRTDATE), MAX(IV.ENDDATE)
> from GRAN_VER GV
> left outer join INVENTORY IV on GV.GRANULE_ID = IV.GRANULE_ID, INVSENSOR
> INVS
> where IV.INV_ID='65' and GV.GRANULE_ID = INVS.granule_id and
> INVS.sensor_id='13'
>
>
> "Aggregate  (cost=736364.52..736364.53 rows=1 width=8) (actual
> time=17532.930..17532.930 rows=1 loops=1)"
> "  ->  Hash Join  (cost=690287.33..734679.77 rows=336949 width=8) (actual
> time=13791.593..17323.080 rows=924675 loops=1)"
> "        Hash Cond: (invs.granule_id = gv.granule_id)"
> "        ->  Seq Scan on invsensor invs  (cost=0.00..36189.41 rows=1288943
> width=4) (actual time=0.297..735.375 rows=1277121 loops=1)"
> "              Filter: (sensor_id = 13)"
> "        ->  Hash  (cost=674401.52..674401.52 rows=1270865 width=16) (actual
> time=13787.698..13787.698 rows=1270750 loops=1)"
> "              ->  Hash Join  (cost=513545.62..674401.52 rows=1270865
> width=16) (actual time=1998.702..13105.578 rows=1270750 loops=1)"
> "                    Hash Cond: (gv.granule_id = iv.granule_id)"
> "                    ->  Seq Scan on gran_ver gv  (cost=0.00..75224.90
> rows=4861490 width=4) (actual time=0.008..1034.885 rows=4867542 loops=1)"
> "                    ->  Hash  (cost=497659.81..497659.81 rows=1270865
> width=12) (actual time=1968.918..1968.918 rows=1270750 loops=1)"
> "                          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on inventory iv
> (cost=24050.00..497659.81 rows=1270865 width=12) (actual
> time=253.542..1387.957 rows=1270750 loops=1)"
> "                                Recheck Cond: (inv_id = 65)"
> "                                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on inven_idx1
> (cost=0.00..23732.28 rows=1270865 width=0) (actual time=214.364..214.364
> rows=1270977 loops=1)"
> "                                      Index Cond: (inv_id = 65)"
> "Total runtime: 17533.100 ms"
>
> some additional info.....
> the table inventory is about 4481 MB and also has postgis types.
> the table gran_ver is about 523 MB
> the table INVSENSOR is about 217 MB
>
> the server itself has 32G RAM with the following set in the postgres conf
> shared_buffers = 3GB
> work_mem = 64MB
> maintenance_work_mem = 512MB
> wal_buffers = 6MB
>
> let me know if I've forgotten anything!  thanks a bunch!!

Late response here, but...

Is there an index on invsensor (sensor_id, granule_id)?  If not, that
might be something to try.  If so, you might want to try to figure out
why it's not being used.

Likewise, is there an index on gran_ver (granule_id)?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company