On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > Robert Haas wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
>> >
>> > This one which makes 50432 the default port.
>>
>> There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.
>
> The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables
> begin with "PG", as requested.
It's easier to read the patches if you do separate changes in separate
patches. Anyway, I'm a bit nervous about this hunk:
+ if (old_cluster.port == DEF_PGUPORT)
+ pg_log(PG_FATAL, "When checking a live old server, "
+ "you must specify the old server's port number.\n");
Is the implication here that I'm now going to need to specify more
than 4 command-line options/environment variables for this to work?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
