Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432
Date
Msg-id 201106271819.p5RIJQY09530@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade defaulting to port 25432
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> > OK, fair enough. ?Should I apply my ports patch to Postgres 9.2?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure which patch you are referring to.
> >
> > This one which makes 50432 the default port.
> 
> There appear to be some other changes mixed into this patch.

The additional changes were to have the existing environment variables
begin with "PG", as requested.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darren Duncan
Date:
Subject: Re: Range Types, constructors, and the type system
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: SSI modularity questions