Re: Should partial dumps include extensions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Should partial dumps include extensions?
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikjRu7t_8TCWxxWC=yf2KVKvunEkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should partial dumps include extensions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Should partial dumps include extensions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There's a complaint here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2011-05/msg00714.php
> about the fact that 9.1 pg_dump always dumps CREATE EXTENSION commands
> for all loaded extensions.  Should we change that?  A reasonable
> compromise might be to suppress extensions in the same cases where we
> suppress procedural languages, ie if --schema or --table was used
> (see "include_everything" switch in pg_dump.c).

Making it work like procedural languages seems sensible to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-alloc ListCell's optimization