* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> Finally, sorry it's kind of a fugly patch, it's just a proof of
> concept and I'd be happy to clean it up if others feel it's worthwhile
> and a reasonable approach, but I really need to get it out there and
> take a break from it (I've been a bit obsessive-compulsive about it
> since PGCon.. :D).
Erm, sorry, just to clarify, while it's a P-O-C patch, it does compile
cleanly and passes all the regression tests, so it's something that one
can play with at least. Not sure if it'd be worth benchmarking it until
we feel comfortable that this is a decent approach, but I wouldn't
complain if someone decided to...
Thanks,
Stephen
