Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikRsbzJ=yJYp-YMRxkNv3Tb8s6kCQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  (I will refrain for
> the moment from speculating whether we'll ever have an index type that
> supports regexp match directly as an indexable operator...)

Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone is
keen to try it.

--
greg


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors