Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)
Date
Msg-id 20110619161334.GB19779@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:48:58PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > (I will refrain for the moment from speculating whether we'll ever
> > have an index type that supports regexp match directly as an
> > indexable operator...)
> 
> Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone
> is keen to try it.

Please post them :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hugetables question