Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=hBPJv=hSS_Bg1rfxWz9QtTRiTmg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> To make PG do it automatically, we'd need to store the _init forks in
> a different tablespace from the remaining forks.  That's probably
> possible, but it seems complicated.

Sounds much better way actually and also quite easy. All we do is keep
the init forks in a subdirectory that identifies the tablespace they
relate to.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory