Re: time-delayed standbys - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: time-delayed standbys
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=+C3xP6M9TJZ6gBmQV8=97ZEQ_hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: time-delayed standbys  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: time-delayed standbys
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Some actions aren't even transactional, such as DROP DATABASE, amongst
>
> Good point.  We'd probably need to add a timestamp to the drop
> database record, as that's a case that people would likely want to
> defend against with this feature.

This means that recovery_target_* code would also need to deal with
DROP DATABASE case.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks, v4
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: time-delayed standbys