Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Жарков Роман
Subject Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows
Date
Msg-id B9F855CF-1756-40FA-B9AF-1F48A9480269@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
I have tested clean REL_11_STABLE.
Commit f02259fe was reverted by df8b5f3e in this branch.
So pg_ctl uses “old” open() function.

regards, Roman

> 18 июля 2019 г., в 15:51, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> написал(а):
>
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:54:16PM +0700, r.zharkov@postgrespro.ru wrote:
>> You are right. I tested branch REL_11_STABLE and it is my mistake.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> The probability is very small. In one of our tests pg_ctl fails with that
>> error sometime.
>> In a test with multiple frequent restarts the probability is 5-6%. On other
>> machines probability differs.
>> To find out the real error code we used the Process Monitor utility.
>
> I would like to be sure of something here.  Are those failures based
> on what you have tested on REL_11_STABLE or do you still see pg_ctl
> complain about such things on HEAD (post f02259fe as mentioned by Tom
> upthread)?  I would like to think that you mean the former and the
> latter, but this thread mentions only the former.
> --
> Michael




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Intermittent pg_ctl failures on Windows
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: SegFault on 9.6.14