> On 17 Jul 2026, at 10:17, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for providing this information; I’ll take a close look at it.LZ4 is
> just too good—no matter how hard I try to improve PGLZ, it can’t even come
> close to it.
That's probably true, but given that there are lots of clusters using pglz in
production, if we could shave x% of time it takes to decode that could still
be worthwhile.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
