Re: Speedup twophase transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stas Kelvich
Subject Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Date
Msg-id B2D1E016-F288-4ACA-8245-6F99EBAAEAAC@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Speedup twophase transactions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
My +1 for moving function to xlogutils.c too.

Now call to this function goes through series of callbacks so it is hard to find it.
Personally I found it only after I have implemented same function by myself (based on code in pg_xlogdump).

Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


> On 12 Jan 2016, at 18:56, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Should we just move the code somewhere just to imply it is generic? Seems
>>> pointless refactoring to me.
>>
>> Er, why not xlogutils.c? Having the 2PC code depending directly on
>> something that is within logicalfuncs.c is weird.
>
> Yes, I agree with Michael -- it's better to place code in its logical
> location than keep it somewhere else just because historically it was
> there.  That way, future coders can find the function more easily.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Speedup twophase transactions