On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> ... and as I recall, we got rid of it principally because the temp
> tables weren't visible to ordinary catalog lookups, thus breaking
> all sorts of client-side logic.
>
Though that wouldn't be the case if the catalogs held a template.....
Anyways I think this horse has been beaten to death. Whoever
implements it will look at the pros and cons and decide which way
they'll go.
--
greg
