Re: Support for Slony 2.0? - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinjfHxUaQqwTRQKLWGeLBDN_bv0vZM6dhqZCOhC@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for Slony 2.0?  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
List pgadmin-hackers
Why don't we have a wizard-type facility to generate a Slonik script,
rather than calling the "bare-metal" functions ourselves? That could
potentially be much more useful. The reason that the existing
facilities are a bit of a chore to use when you get past a couple of
nodes is that paths and listens have to be individually managed, and
the number involved increases quadratically with respect to the number
of nodes. In other words, it's a GUI analogue of writing a Slonik
script, as opposed to a higher level facility that usefully abstracts
details away.

I could imagine this really helping with complicated Slony setups
involving daisy-chaining.

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?
Next
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for Slony 2.0?