On 15 March 2011 15:51, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 15:37, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Thom Brown wrote:
>>> On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Applied. ?I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
>>> > comments. ?I assume that is the right procedure.
>>>
>>> *SNIP*
>>>
>>> >> + ? ? ? ? ? ? "COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS 'default administrative connection database';\n",
>>>
>>> Default administrative connection database? Where's the "connection"
>>> bit come from?
>>
>> There was discussion that 'postgres' is the database that is used for
>> performing administrative connections, e.g. createdb. Yeah, kind of
>> odd, but that's what it is used for.
>
> Hmm... there's actually no mention of that in the docs for such tools:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/app-createdb.html
>
> There's also little mention of this "administrative" database in the
> docs beyond saying it's merely a copy of template1 used as a default
> database for users and applications to connect to.
>
> I also notice there's no choice but to use the "postgres" database
> with these tools. Shouldn't we have an option that allows us to
> specify an alternative database?
>
> e.g.
>
> createdb -d alternativedb newdb
And example patch attached.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
