On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 19:46, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>
>> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would
>> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and
>> pg_stat_replication_slave.
>
> Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it
> contains, and then we can fix the name during beta.
We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
object...) during beta.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
