On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 19:48 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 19:46, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> >
> >> To my way of thinking, pg_stat_walsender and pg_stat_walreceiver would
> >> be more clear than pg_stat_replication_master and
> >> pg_stat_replication_slave.
> >
> > Let's commit it so that some of us can get a look at the data it
> > contains, and then we can fix the name during beta.
>
> We try to avoid inidb-requiring changes (like renaming a system
> object...) during beta.
Why?
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
