Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinU=-8X6cnf1R=9-VQ389cet9TT39aZbMNnBQYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm going with hacks.  Any API that requires you to print to a string
>> so you can turn around and immediately convert it back to an integer
>> is not too swift.
>
> Oh, you're complaining about SetConfigOption, not the assign hooks.

I was actually complaining about the latter, and then switched gears
to the former.  I'm an equal-opportunity complainer today, I guess...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2