Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinDIyJgOZqPBymJA6bMiw3ZCrCau6Lp1h5eZ1Ko@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Should I be concerned that we are redesigning HS features at this stage
> in the release?

Yep.  You can decide whether you want to be concerned by the redesign
itself, or by the concerns about the underlying code that are
motivating the redesigns, but yes, you should definitely be concerned.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels