Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 4BE0ED80.3030102@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>   
>> Should I be concerned that we are redesigning HS features at this stage
>> in the release?
>>     
>
> Yep.  You can decide whether you want to be concerned by the redesign
> itself, or by the concerns about the underlying code that are
> motivating the redesigns, but yes, you should definitely be concerned.
>
>
>   

Our process is shot to pieces. But then, we knew that, didn't we ;-)

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: including PID or backend ID in relpath of temp rels
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful