On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 18:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 17:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
>>>> Bug 5245 is not the same issue.
>>>
>>> BTW, does anyone know exactly how to fix that? =A0I'm looking at a rela=
ted
>>> request internal to Red Hat right now.
>
>> I have it on my TODO to figure it out, but from what I can tell it's
>> very close to being undocumented, like most of OpenSSL.
>
> I've been googling this a bit, and the theory I have at the moment is
> that Craig's proposed fix for #5468 will *also* fix #5245. =A0However,
> I'm not too adept at using openssl so actually testing that will
> probably take a bit of time. =A0Are you in a position to check it quickly?
'fraid not. I'm doing intensive training this week, so the first
chance I'll have to give a proper check of it will be next week.
sorry.
--=20
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
