On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 20:28, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hmmm I think "pg_stat_standby" might be more relevant but I definitely
>>> agree something more newbie appropriate is in order.
>>
>> I'd be fine with that name, too.
>
> That seems kind of backwards though - given that the view only
> contains data on the master...
I think pg_stat_replication is better than pg_stat_standby, but I'm
still not convinced we shouldn't go with the obvious
pg_stat_walsenders.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
