Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimiGa22HJFCj8_aZcsZfPfAgmE9yxn4VfOTj3sx@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 11/22/2010 06:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Maybe instead of "textual label", we should say "name"?  But that
>>> doesn't seem like quite le mot juste either.  "label" is actually a
>>> pretty good word for the text representation of an enum value.
>
>> Oh my boots and buttons. I think we're splitting some very fine hairs
>> here. A few weeks back you were telling us that label wasn't a very good
>> word and shouldn't be sanctified in the SQL.
>
> It isn't a very good word for the abstract value, IMO, but the text
> representation is a different concept.

+1 for what Andrew said.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs