Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Date
Msg-id 21845.1290473194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/22/2010 06:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe instead of "textual label", we should say "name"?  But that
>> doesn't seem like quite le mot juste either.  "label" is actually a
>> pretty good word for the text representation of an enum value.

> Oh my boots and buttons. I think we're splitting some very fine hairs 
> here. A few weeks back you were telling us that label wasn't a very good 
> word and shouldn't be sanctified in the SQL.

It isn't a very good word for the abstract value, IMO, but the text
representation is a different concept.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: s/LABEL/VALUE/ for ENUMs