Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date
Msg-id AANLkTimAUQ2wxZC8+J8YRAnTEcy9jspDBk16Z+8795vQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>> While working on adding support for SQL/Med objects to pgAdmin, I'm
>>> quite surprised to see there is no way to add comments to SQL/Med
>>> objects. Is this on purpose or is it just something that was simply missed?
>
>> I think it's an oversight.  We should probably fix this.
>
> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that.  I'd like to see if we can
> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort.  I believe
> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
> of other basic places ...

Are you going to work on this?  If not I can pick it up, at least
insofar as making the comment stuff work across the board.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock problem with autovacuum truncating heap
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects