Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTim7Xm_06-OiGXiU+r+zXUKV7gaVZcXuMRvgmXUv@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
2010/8/6 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with
>> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one
>> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use
>> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can
>> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or
>> readability for example a Perl's hash tables.
>
> Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)
>
:)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch