Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date
Msg-id 1281127738.2563.3.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-08-06 at 21:31 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It must not be a function. Just I missing any tool that helps with
> complex structured data. This proposed kind functions has one
> advantage - there isn't necessary any change in parser. Yes, I can use
> a pair of arrays, I can use a one array with seq name, value, I can
> use a custom parser. But nothing from these offers a comfort or
> readability for example a Perl's hash tables.

Maybe you should just use PL/XSLT. :-)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch