Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup
Date
Msg-id AANLkTilfZBRfYs3bdpNzbwPA23SRJbWvI4i5gdGDMLbM@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: debug log in pg_archivecleanup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is because pg_archivecleanup puts the line break "\n" in the head of
>> debug message. Why should we do so?
>>
>> -----------------------
>>  if (debug)
>>     fprintf(stderr, "\n%s:  removing \"%s\"", progname, WALFilePath);
>> -----------------------
>
> We also need "\n" at line 308.
>  L.125: fprintf(stderr, "\n%s:  removing \"%s\"", progname, WALFilePath);
>  L.308: fprintf(stderr, "%s:  keep WAL file %s and later", progname, exclusiveCleanupFileName);

Yes. What about the attached patch?

> Note that we don't need a line break at Line 130
> because strerror() fills the last %s.
>  L.130: fprintf(stderr, "\n%s: ERROR failed to remove \"%s\": %s",

Right.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE list (was Re: New PGXN Extension site)
Next
From: Joseph Adams
Date:
Subject: Should the JSON datatype be a specialization of text?