Re: SR slaves and .pgpass - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date
Msg-id AANLkTilE9PADqQNsUEfoT86kgq5RLx6zeId8vABgEoqt@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> But I think that we don't need to specify other than the wildcard
>> in the database field of .pgpass to use the replication-specific
>> password if the replication-specific user is supplied in .pgpass.
>> So the current code is enough for me. Am I missing something?
>
> You're looking at it from the perspective of somebody who knows
> exactly how the code works.  What Andrew tried is exactly what
> 95% of other people would try.  There doesn't seem to me to be
> any very good argument against making it work for them.

Hmm.. is it worth going back to my proposal?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass