Re: SR slaves and .pgpass - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date
Msg-id 26431.1275966066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SR slaves and .pgpass  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> But I think that we don't need to specify other than the wildcard
> in the database field of .pgpass to use the replication-specific
> password if the replication-specific user is supplied in .pgpass.
> So the current code is enough for me. Am I missing something?

You're looking at it from the perspective of somebody who knows
exactly how the code works.  What Andrew tried is exactly what
95% of other people would try.  There doesn't seem to me to be
any very good argument against making it work for them.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY