Re: To Signal The postmaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: To Signal The postmaster
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikvn1HffsroUVKeR8J=6D7oxgYJWcTsi7JyDeWj@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to To Signal The postmaster  (aaliya zarrin <aaliya.zarrin@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: To Signal The postmaster  (aaliya zarrin <aaliya.zarrin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:22 PM, aaliya zarrin <aaliya.zarrin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this provision already there in the code?
> There ate already SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are handled in the postmaster? is it
> for the same?

SIGUSR1 is already used. SIGUSR2 is actually unused, but reserved for children
according to the source code comment.

Though I've been thinking about this topic, a good idea doesn't occur to me yet.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg00929.php

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extensions Patch
Next
From: flyusa2010 fly
Date:
Subject: random write in xlog?