On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kirkwood
<mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
> On 21/01/11 15:24, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
>>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what
>>> was passed through, not what was removed.
>>
>> Hmm, I guess I see your point now. Well, I'm not wedded to the name,
>> but I don't like removed any better.
>>
>> Rows eliminated?
>>
>
> Rows filtered *out* ?
Seems like Tom just had the same thought. Works for me. I'm still
not thrilled with the proposed formatting, but I can probably live
with it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
