Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Date
Msg-id AANLkTikQCagn45DQwN8RN+SLKdS90UH7E2bW6++-YwPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
>     BTW, you use the term 'fictitious' in the comments, would it be better
> to standardize the term used for such an index? So either the comment would
> be changed to call it hypothetical, or the structure member would be changed
> to isfictitious.

Yeah, hypothetical is the more-established term I think.

Please find the patch attached.

Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Usability tweaks for extension commands
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling