Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Date
Msg-id 9560.1297897425@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> [ scratches head ... ]  Why is your version generating so many
>> unnecessary @extschema@ uses?

> I just ran create table tomlist as select your query and create table
> dimlist as select my query, then:
> ...
> No difference on @extschema@ use here.

Well, when I did it I only got @extschema@ uses in tsearch2 (see the
committed update scripts), so there's *something* different about what
you're doing.  I'm unsure what.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix corner case for binary upgrade: extension functions in pg_catalog.