Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aidan Van Dyk
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id AANLkTik+gdwG=TxknrYCg2fgwB5b-XdM-X-jNFgt8Dw+@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad
> enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say,
> search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community.

Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"...

And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less*
ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to
keep going back to gmane's search)

a.


--
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James William Pye
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/python improvements
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump