Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 4D152EB6.6000407@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Responses Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/24/2010 06:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com>  wrote:
>
>> I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad
>> enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say,
>> search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community.
> Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"...
>
> And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less*
> ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to
> keep going back to gmane's search)
>
>

It's deja vu all over again. See mailing list archives for details.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump