Re: why is there no TRIGGER ON SELECT ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dmitriy Igrishin
Subject Re: why is there no TRIGGER ON SELECT ?
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=MQ6GJYzDM8577bCjz8WcE+d0+FotnA1w-omne@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to why is there no TRIGGER ON SELECT ?  (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: why is there no TRIGGER ON SELECT ?
List pgsql-general
Hey Melvin,

2011/2/22 Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@yahoo.com>

Other than "It's currently not available", can anyone provide a logical explanation of why triggers cannot be implemented for SELECT statements, or rules for SELECT must be DO INSTEAD SELECT?

PostgreSQL was derived from Ingres, and Ingres had a nice auditing feature that also handled SELECT.  It would be simple enough to write a RULE or TRIGGER on a SELECT to just log access, but for some unexplainable reason (at least to my knowledge) this has been greatly restricted in PostgreSQL. I am sure many DBA's and developers would greatly appreciate the addition of a TRIGGER or RULE on SELECT, and it should be simple enough to change the code, so I am curious as to why this has never been done.

Thanks in advance.
Why not use function which returns table and wrap the
logging (auditing) code in it ?



Melvin Davidson





--
// Dmitriy.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Itnal, Prakash (NSN - IN/Bangalore)"
Date:
Subject: Restart Issue in Cluster environment
Next
From: Adarsh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Mysql to Postgresql