Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Itagaki Takahiro
Subject Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=FowVPVEbPfMxfH_DSSz8aPSwMtoDJE5fTdr5m@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi, Leonardo-san,

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The wording should be something like "CLUSTER requires transient disk
> space equal to about twice the size of the table plus its indexes".

Could you merge those discussions into the final patch?
Also, please check whether my modification broke your patch.
Thank you.

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: O_DSYNC broken on MacOS X?
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres vs. intel ccNUMA on Linux