Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date
Msg-id 7E8F050F-4A82-4D69-9F3F-14FE78054DCC@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Leonardo-san,
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The wording should be something like "CLUSTER requires transient disk
>> space equal to about twice the size of the table plus its indexes".
>
> Could you merge those discussions into the final patch?
> Also, please check whether my modification broke your patch.
> Thank you.

It sounds like the costing model might need a bit more work before we commit this.

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding getrusage profiling data to EXPLAIN output
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: security hook on table creation