Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=AWjYqU2yhNG3ca6cdP-+9J5FouoHZ1SEXJE4_@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)  (Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>)
Responses Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)  (Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Joel Jacobson <joel@gluefinance.com> wrote:
> 2011/1/8 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> I don't think your analysis is correct.  Each entry in pg_depend
>> represents the fact that one object depends on another object, and an
>> object could easily depend on more than one other object, or be
>> depended upon by more than one other object, or depend on one object
>> and be depended on by another.
>
> What does that have to do with this?

Oops.  I misread your query.  I thought the duplicates were because
you were feeding pg_describe_object the same classoid, objoid,
objsubid pair more than once, but I see now that's not the case (UNION
!= UNION ALL).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)